Ellis County GOP Blog

Welcome to the official blog of the Ellis County GOP. I hope this to be a location to quickly get out important information regarding the Ellis County GOP. 972-938-9383 or the Chairman's cell at 214-394-4961.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Non-Binding Resolution Against Iraq War Voted on in House

QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution

BILL TITLE: Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq

YEAS 246

NAYS 246

NV 6

How did your Representative vote? CLICK HERE

President Bush: This one is always worth a good laugh!

President Bush at this year's White House Correspondence Dinner

http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=-1921276117304287501&q=genre:comedy

Monday, February 12, 2007

Bank of America (BAC) Credit Card Program for Illegal Immigrations

Well, here's a new one for rewarding law-breakers. Bank of America (BAC) is introducing a new program in the U.S. seeking to provide credit cards to people without a social security card or credit history. The only history one needs is to have a checking account for 3 months....

Now, this can either infuriate you because they are offering credit cards to illegals helping make "their dream in America" come true. Or you can can get upset about the usury interest rates and large upfront fee required with these cards. Either way BAC needs to be forced to withdraw this new policy!

WSJ 02/12/07 -

Lender Risks Controversy Aiming New Credit Card At Illegal Immigrants

By MIRIAM JORDAN and VALERIE BAUERLEINFebruary 13, 2007; Page A1

LOS ANGELES -- In the latest sign of the U.S. banking industry's aggressive pursuit of the Hispanic market, Bank of America Corp. has quietly begun offering credit cards to customers without Social Security numbers -- typically illegal immigrants.

In recent years, banks across the country have begun offering checking accounts and, in some cases, mortgages to the nation's fast-growing ranks of undocumented immigrants, most of whom are Hispanic. But these immigrants generally haven't been able to get major credit cards, making it hard for them to develop a credit history and expand their purchasing power.

The new Bank of America program is open to people who lack both a Social Security number and a credit history, as long as they have held a checking account with the bank for three months without an overdraft. Most adults in the U.S. who don't have a Social Security number are undocumented immigrants.

The Charlotte, N.C., banking giant tested the program last year at five branches in Los Angeles, and last week expanded it to 51 branches in Los Angeles County, home to the largest concentration of illegal immigrants in the U.S. The bank hopes to roll out the program nationally later this year.

"We are willing to grant credit to someone with little or no credit history," says Lance Weaver, Bank of America's head of international card services, whose team designed the program based in part on the bank's experience in markets like Spain, which lack conventional credit bureaus to rate a client's credit-worthiness.

The credit cards involved aren't cheap. They come with a high interest rate and an upfront fee. And the idea of catering to illegal immigrants is controversial.

Bank of America defends the program, saying it complies with U.S. banking and antiterrorism laws. Company executives say that the initiative isn't about politics, but rather about meeting the needs of an untapped group of potential customers.

"These people are coming here for quality of life, and they deserve somebody to give them a chance to achieve that quality of life," says Brian Tuite, the bank's director of Latin America card operations and one of the architects of the program.

Critics say Bank of America is knowingly making a product available to people who are violating U.S. immigration law. "They are clearly crossing the line; they are actually aiding and abetting people who broke the law," says Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a group that advocates a crackdown on illegal immigration.

Typical of the new card's customers is Antonio Sanchez, a Mexican immigrant whose only major asset is a white 1996 Ford Thunderbird, which he drives to the two restaurants where he works each day on opposite sides of Los Angeles. Mr. Sanchez, who says he sneaked across the border a decade ago, has been a customer of Bank of America's East Hollywood branch for nine years. He has no borrowing history and no Social Security number.

Paying Balances
To obtain a Bank of America Visa card with a $500 line of credit, Mr. Sanchez had to put down $99. If he stays within his $500 limit and pays his balances in a timely fashion, he will receive his $99 security payment back in three to six months, and his credit limit might be increased.
"I always wanted to start building credit to buy a home, but I couldn't," says Mr. Sanchez, a father of three, who earns about $25,000 a year from his two jobs. "When a señorita at the bank told me about this card, I couldn't miss the opportunity to get it. You need credit to succeed in this country"

"The variable annual percentage rate charged on Mr. Sanchez's card is 21.24%, higher than the average interest rate of 18.1% card issuers nationwide charge on unpaid balances, according to the Nilson Report, an industry newsletter based in Carpinteria, Calif.
David Robertson, publisher of the report, says a rate of 21.24% is "unquestionably high." "If that's the rate you're offered, it's a pretty safe bet you're in a high-risk group," he said.
To assess an applicant, the bank employs "judgmental lending," a concept pioneered by MBNA Corp., the credit-card company that Bank of America acquired in January 2006. In essence, the bank bases its evaluation of a potential client's credit-worthiness on a subjective review by its employees, rather than on standardized financial data crunched by a computer.

Unorthodox initiatives like the new credit-card program may be crucial to Bank of America's long-term success. In the past the bank, which operates in 31 states and the District of Columbia, grew mostly by buying up other banks. Now, however, it is bumping up against a regulatory cap that bars any U.S. bank from an acquisition that would give it more than 10% of the nation's total bank deposits. That means Bank of America's only way to grow domestically is to sell more products to existing customers and to attract new ones.........."

"..........Department of Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke said banking products aimed at illegal immigrants "reinforce the need for a temporary worker program" that the Bush administration has been promoting. That program would screen, tax and otherwise regulate immigrant workers and, the administration contends, would squeeze out illegal workers who now use forged or stolen documents to get jobs, driver's licenses and occasionally credit.

Anti-money-laundering regulations passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks put more pressure on banks to verify customers' identity and watch for suspicious transactions, but they don't require banks to ascertain whether account holders are in the U.S. legally. Most banks require a Social Security number or ITIN to open an account, but regulations also allow them to accept other government-issued forms of identification in some instances, including passport numbers, alien identification numbers or any government-issued document with photo showing nationality or place of residence."

THE REST OF THE STORY

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

Here's a nice piece from Ellis County's own David Hunnicutt. As you may recall he is the county party's Sargeant at Arms & and a Precinct Chairman. It goes without saying the party does not neccesarily endorse the Captain's opinions. They are only provided for your interest.


Having just reviewed Sen. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.’s “I wanna be president” speech, published in the NY Times, I could not help but opine.

Drumming up emotionally based parallelisms between himself and Abraham Lincoln in an attempt to put himself on a pedestal seems to be a repeat of the all too familiar. When politicians compare themselves to previous politicians, I immediately question their sincerity, and instead start to recognize their lack of originality and that they are but another version of the status quo. To espouse that there are problems in Washington, D.C., in our nation, and around the world, is not novel. We are all too aware of the quagmire of politics that our country is slowly but surely sinking into. To fix those problems, Mr. Obama, takes more than a pretty speech obviously designed to stroke the egos of the far left.

The closest thing to an “answer” that I could derive from his announcement for seeking the Presidency, was the statement of his intent to establish universal medical care. There is no doubt that our medical system is indeed a disaster that needs rebuilding; however, the answers (though elusive) by no means lay in socialism.

Mr. Obama may have the answers…I don’t know. But I do know that anyone who professes to have the answers usually does not understand the questions. Far be it from me to attempt to sway the opinion of the leftist in this country as to which candidate they should present to the public in their vie for the office of the Presidency, but it concerns me to see an individual who seemingly is saying “trust me, I have a plan” (but then does not even give a hint of what that plan may be). It rings of politics as usual. Senator Obama declares that he is not “politics as usual”, but infers that he is some version of the personification of a great hope for the oppressed peoples of America, if not the world.

The people of a portion of the state of Illinois elected him to represent them in the House of Senate…he did not come forward to stop the encroachment of the government upon the people through the recent nationwide abuses of eminent domain. He did not join in a crusade to stop the Real ID Act, the Military Commissions Act, nor a plethora of other recent legislative acts aimed at undermining the liberties of the people. He has not swayed the Senate to close our borders to protect our citizens. How now are we to believe that by being President and Commander in Chief of the Armed forces he will magically solve the problems? He has said that the problem in Iraq is a political problem, not a military one. I would expect as much from a lawyer turned politician, who never wore the uniform, but wants the job of quite possibly ordering uniformed Americans to their deaths.

Our current misguided administration, which Mr. Obama berates (and possibly deservedly so), has indeed entangled our nation in a nightmare called the Middle East. Soon, that nightmare may include Iran. Will that too, sir, be political? The entanglement…yes; the answer…no. The answer is to allow our military to complete the mission, and then come home. When towers fall and American civilians die, and each day more American blood is spilled on foreign sand…that is a military issue, sir!

It is little wonder that the Hollywood socialites are so entranced with him…his words are eloquent, his message (though without substance) is moving, his demeanor proud, yet humble…he fits in well within a crowd of actors, who in another time would have been called jesters, chosen to entertain, not elected to make laws or establish policy. I could not help but wonder, is he running for president, or auditioning for the role of Moses in an upcoming remake of “The Ten Commandments”?

I agree that it is indeed time for change, but that change will not come from emotional rhetoric. It will come when the people of the nation at long last see politicians for what they are, and amass together to take back their liberties, stand up for their inherent conservative moral values and their belief in Christ, and place in representative offices, Statesmen, brought forth from the people themselves (not from law schools), who will speak for the interest of the people, not for the interest of the corporate, political or social elite.

David C. Hunnicutt
Ellis County, Texas
214 766 8708

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Pelosi’s Partisanship Falls Flat

Newsmax.com's Washington Insider Discusses how non-partisan the Dems have been since taking over the congress in January.

Coming to power, the Democrats promised they would work with Republicans in a bipartisan manner to achieve results for the country.

“I accept this gavel in the spirit of partnership, not partisanship,” a beaming Nancy Pelosi told her colleagues after her election as speaker. “In this House, we may belong to different parties, but we serve one country.”

In fact, when it comes to cooperation across the aisle, Republicans say the Democrats have been far more intransigent than they were. When Dr. Paul S. Teller, deputy director of the House Republican Study Committee, e-mailed a staffer in the House Republican leadership to ask, “Any word on next week’s schedule?” the staffer e-mailed back, “Hahahahaha.”

While Republicans did not lay out a detailed agenda for Democrats when they were in power, they did give them a heads up on the issues most likely to come up during the week. “They have us on total lock-down mode,” said a senior GOP aide. “No amendments allowed. No advance notice of changes to bill text. Little advance distribution of bill text. We Republicans may not have been angels to the Democrats, but we never did this — and certainly not on legislation as big as the 100-hour agenda.” NEWSMAX.COM

Monday, February 05, 2007

China vs USA: On Satellite-Destroying Weapons Issue

Everyone is concerned about China's destruction of one of its satellites last week. But what was the message China was conveying to the US? Ultimately, It looks like it could be a "shot across the bow" regarding America's continued position on Taiwan.
To further clarify whether such actions have taken place before it appears they have. During the '80s The United State & the USSR both developed an tested scuh weaponry.

EMABASSY OF THE US, JAPAN: U.S. Seeks More Transparency from China on Defense Issues

And from the Chinese language Liberty Times: (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times):

"On Jan. 29, the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) ran an editorial discussing the impact of China's recent launch of its new satellite-destroying weapon on the overall US and Japanese regional strategy. Besides those issues, China's decision is going to have major repercussions for the Taiwanese space program.
By successfully reproducing the anti-satellite technology developed by the US and the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the Chinese military has caused Europe, the US and Japan to question the nature of its space development program."
READ TO READ MORE

Friday, February 02, 2007

TX. Senator Kip Averitt Friend of Elderly

Ellis County's own state senator Kip Averitt has file SJR 13 which would help out senior property tax payers.

The introduction reads as follows: READ FULL TEXT

"Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for a reduction of the limitation on the total amount of ad valorem taxes that may be imposed for public school purposes on the residence homesteads of the elderly or disabled to reflect any reduction in the rate of those taxes and providing that state appropriations made for the purpose of directly reducing local government taxes do not count against the constitutional state spending limit."

Senator, Thank you for keeping in mind the seniors in your district. Many in Texas who live on a fixed income have a hard enough time as it is.